Compare

Switching accountants vs staying: when a clinic should move

TL;DR: Most owners who want to fire their accountant do not have a bad accountant. They have the wrong kind of help for the size they have grown into, which is a different problem with a different fix. Below: how to tell those two apart, what a switch actually costs in your time rather than in fees, when in the year to move, and what to ask a replacement before you sign.

Option A

Stay and fix the relationship

Keep your current accountant and change what you ask of them. Cheapest option by a distance, and the right one more often than most owners expect. Works when the work is accurate but narrow.

Option B

Switch

Move to a new firm. Costs you real time, not just fees, and the cost lands mostly on you rather than on them. Worth it when the problem is accuracy, responsiveness, or a ceiling the current firm cannot clear.

CategoryStay and fix the relationshipSwitch
The problem it actually solvesA scope problem. Your books are right, but nobody is telling you what they mean, and nobody has ever mentioned your margin by location or by provider.An accuracy or trust problem. Numbers arrive late, arrive wrong, or change after you ask about them. No amount of rescoping fixes that.
The misdiagnosis to rule out firstMost owners who want to switch have outgrown a bookkeeper rather than hired a bad one. A bookkeeper records what happened. That is the job, done correctly, and no amount of pressure turns it into forward-looking analysis.If you switch to another firm doing the same scope of work, you will have paid the switching cost and bought the same ceiling. Same job, new logo.
What it costs youOne difficult conversation and a written scope. If it works, you are done for the price of an afternoon.Your time, mostly. Expect to re-explain your chart of accounts, your payer mix, and every non-obvious entry your last firm never documented. Budget for a period where the new firm is slower than the old one, because they are learning what your predecessor already knew.
Timing within the yearAny time. Rescoping does not touch your filing calendar.Cleanest immediately after a year-end close, when the prior year is finished and signed off and the new firm starts from a closed set of books. Mid-year is workable but leaves a seam in the record that somebody has to own at year-end. The worst time is inside filing season, when both firms are at capacity and neither will give you attention.
What actually transfersNothing moves, which is the point.Less than owners expect. Your accounting file and bank feeds move. Prior-year workpapers, the reasoning behind entries, and any institutional memory about why something is booked the way it is generally do not, unless you ask for them explicitly and in writing before you give notice.
Risk if you get it wrongYou spend another year without the information you needed, and find out at the point where the decision was already made.A gap in continuity at year-end, and a filing calendar nobody owns during the handover. Both are avoidable, and both are common precisely because they are avoidable and therefore nobody plans for them.
The verdict

Diagnose the problem before you change the supplier

Ask one question before anything else: in the last twelve months, has your accountant been wrong, or have they been narrow? If the numbers were accurate and on time but nobody ever told you which location was carrying the others, that is not a firm to fire. That is a scope you never bought, and you can often buy it from the firm you already have, or alongside them. If the numbers themselves were late, wrong, or unexplainable, no rescope will fix that and the switching cost is worth paying. The failure mode we see most often is the third case: an owner switches for a scope problem, buys the same scope from a new firm, and concludes eighteen months later that accountants are all the same.

Frequently Asked Questions

Not sure which is right for your clinic?

Take the 4-minute financial assessment and we'll tell you exactly what your practice needs.

Stanislav Sukhinin, CFA — Founder of Sorso
Stanislav Sukhinin, CFA

Founder of Sorso and a CFA charterholder. Before Sorso, Stan spent 19 years in corporate finance at institutions including UniCredit and Société Générale — managing a $450M loan portfolio and making senior partner at a major mezzanine lender by 29 — then built a fractional CFO firm exclusively for outpatient healthcare clinics.