Benchmarks

Physical Therapy financial benchmarks

How does your pt practice compare? Key metrics cited to specialty association data and cross-checked against Sorso client engagements.

Reviewed by Stanislav Sukhinin, CFALast re-verified 2026-04-10

Benchmarks are published industry ranges and Sorso-observed ranges from our client engagements. They are directional, not prescriptive — use them as a starting point for diagnosis, not a target.

Data reflects 2024 reporting cycles where available, with 2023 data used when a newer survey has not yet been published.

Profit Margin

15%

Range: 10%–20%

Overhead Ratio

85%

Range: 80%–90%

Revenue / Provider

$250K–$400K

Annual range

Collection Rate

90%

Range: 88%–93%

Denial Rate

10%

Range: 8%–12%

A/R Days

35 days

Range: 2845 days

Source: Industry benchmarks compiled from MGMA, specialty association surveys, and practice management databases. Updated 2026.

How your practice compares

Where the money goes

Category%Description
staffing55%Clinical and administrative staff wages, benefits, and payroll taxes
rent12%Facility lease, utilities, and maintenance costs
supplies5%Clinical supplies, office supplies, and consumables
equipment8%Equipment leases, maintenance, and depreciation
marketing5%Digital advertising, website, patient acquisition
insurance5%Malpractice, general liability, and property insurance
Other10%IT, professional fees, continuing education, miscellaneous

Payer mix

Typical payer distribution for physical therapy practices. A balanced payer mix reduces dependency on any single source and improves revenue predictability.

Collection rates by payer

What top performers look like

Profit Margin

22%+ (APTA Private Practice Section Benchmarking, 2024)

Collection Rate

94%+ (MedBridge PT Benchmarks, 2024)

Denial Rate

< 7% (APTA PPS Benchmarking, 2024)

A/R Days

< 25 days (APTA Academy of Private Practice, 2024)

KPIs specific to physical therapy

KPIBenchmarkDescription
Visits per Therapist per Day10–12 (APTA PPS Benchmarking Survey, 2024)Daily patient volume per full-time therapist; drives revenue capacity
Units per Visit3.0–4.0 (MedBridge PT Benchmarks; WebPT Billing Benchmarks, 2024)Average billable units delivered per patient encounter; 3.5 is a common operating target
Plan of Care Completion Rate70–80% (APTA Academy of Private Practice, 2024)Percentage of patients completing their full prescribed treatment plan
Cancel/No-Show Rate< 10% (APTA PPS Benchmarking, 2024)Percentage of scheduled visits canceled or missed; directly impacts revenue

From Sorso

PT clinics Sorso works with live or die on visits-per-therapist and cancel rates; when we see overhead above the 85% median it is nearly always staffing ratio, not rent.

Sources

  • APTA Private Practice Section — Benchmarking Survey (2024)
  • APTA Academy of Private Practice — Practice Management data (2024)
  • MedBridge PT Benchmarks Report (2024)
  • WebPT — State of Rehab Therapy Report & Billing Benchmarks (2024)
  • MGMA DataDive — Cost & Revenue: Physical Therapy slice (2024)

Data reflects the latest available specialty association and MGMA reports through 2025; re-verified April 2026.

SS
Stanislav Sukhinin, CFA

Founder of Sorso. 18 years in corporate finance. Managed a $450M loan portfolio before building a fractional CFO firm exclusively for healthcare clinics.

Want to see where your practice falls?

Take our free financial health assessment and get a personalized comparison against these benchmarks.

Get your free assessment

Related services